李伟

Personal profile

个人简介

教育背景: 1.2003-2007年:毕业于山东建筑大学,学士; 2.2007-2010年:毕业于西安建筑科技大学,硕士; 3.2009-2012年:毕业于西安建筑科技大学,博士; 工作经历: 1.2012-2015:担任西安建筑科技大学环境学院给排水专业讲师; 2. 2018.12-2019.12:澳大利亚南澳大学(UniSA)国家公派访问学者; 3.2015至今:担任西...

more+

论文成果

Detection of phthalates in water using ultra performance liquid chromatography - electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometra MRM mode – ‘ghost peaks’ and measurement methodology

发布时间:2024-08-09  点击次数:

所属单位:环境与市政工程学院

发表刊物:Analytical Methods

关键字:中文关键字:痕量分析;超高效液相色谱-串连四级杆质谱;邻苯二甲酸酯,英文关键字:Trace analysis;UPLC-ESI-MS/MS;Phthalates

摘要:In the analysis of phthalates, specifically diethyl phthalate (DEP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP), butylbenzyl phthalate (BBP), and diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) using ultra performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-ESI-MS/MS), ‘ghost peaks’ appeared when a gradient liquid chromatography elution mode was employed. A systematic diagnostic analytical protocol was designed to show that the source of the persistent ‘ghost peaks’, which jeopardized a quantitative analysis of these endocrine disruptors was the mobile phase. A trace amount of DEHP in the mobile phase, either from ultrapure water or organic solvent, was responsible for the observed phenomenon. In contrast to gradient elution, isocratic chromatographic elution mode (ICEM) was found to be free of the problem at the expense of less effective separation of DBP and BBP. Thus, a detection method for analyzing the phthalates is proposed based on ICEM and the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode with multi-channel detection in the UPLC-MS/MS. In the method development, tap water matrix effects were examined and a solution for detection intensity suppression in the analysis of tap water samples was proposed. An addition of methanol into tap water samples could basically relieve the signal detection suppression by the real water matrix. This provides a detection method of these trace environmental pollutants with a linear range between 0.5 to 50 ng mL-1 and detection limits (LODs) (0.32–0.54 ng mL-1) without need of sample preconcentration. This is a much simpler and faster method than gas chromatography-electron capture detection (GC-ECD) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), with comparable detection sensitivity.

备注:段晋明

第一作者:段晋明,李伟

论文类型:期刊论文

卷号:卷:3

期号:期:2

页面范围:页:314-321

是否译文:

发表时间:2011-02-01

访问量:     最后更新时间:--